Dick Conway
Baltimore Orioles 1886; Boston Beaneaters 1887–1888
Percentile snapshot
1887 season — qualified pitchers
of 48 qualified 1887 pitchers (min 127 IP)
Career, era-adjusted
sWAR measured against every career in history, 24,011 of them. Only era-adjusted career stats carry a percentile — a raw career total gets a rank instead, because pooling the 1890s with the 2020s is a choice, not a measurement.
Season by season
Batting
| Season | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | wRC+ | OPS+ | wOBA | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1886 | 9 | 37 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .206 | .270 | .265 | .535 | 78.3 | 68.4 | .264 | -1.7 |
| 1887 | 42 | 162 | 145 | 20 | 36 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 5 | 0 | .248 | .327 | .290 | .617 | 82.1 | 72.4 | .296 | 1.2 |
| 1888 | 7 | 26 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | .160 | .192 | .160 | .352 | 27.7 | 13.0 | .170 | 0.7 |
Pitching
| Season | G | GS | W | L | SV | CG | SHO | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | IP | ERA | WHIP | K/9 | FIP | FIP- | ERA+ | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1886 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 106 | 58 | 43 | 64 | 6 | 76.7 | 6.81 | 1.943 | 7.51 | 4.27 | 124.0 | 50.6 | -1.7 |
| 1887 | 26 | 26 | 9 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 249 | 115 | 86 | 45 | 10 | 222.3 | 4.66 | 1.507 | 1.82 | 4.53 | 111.9 | 86.9 | 1.2 |
| 1888 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 49 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 53.0 | 2.38 | 1.075 | 2.04 | 3.18 | 112.2 | 119.1 | 0.7 |
sWAR is the season TOTAL for a player who both hit and pitched: the record book carries one figure per season, not a split, so the same number appears on both lines rather than being counted twice.
Career totals
Batting
Pitching
A total is called out only where it ranks in the all-time top 500; hover a figure for its rank and the size of the field it was ranked in. Ranks are absolute facts and carry no percentile — the population for "career home runs" would be an editorial choice, and the rank is not.