Elmer Sutcliffe
Chicago White Stockings 1884–1885; St. Louis Maroons 1885; Detroit Wolverines 1888; Cleveland Spiders 1889; Cleveland Infants 1890; Washington Statesmen 1891; Baltimore Orioles 1892
Percentile snapshot
1890 season — qualified batters
of 149 qualified 1890 batters (min 406 PA) · 1 stat not shown: every qualified player held the same value, so a percentile there carries no information
Career, era-adjusted
sWAR measured against every career in history, 24,011 of them. Only era-adjusted career stats carry a percentile — a raw career total gets a rank instead, because pooling the 1890s with the 2020s is a choice, not a measurement.
Season by season
Batting
| Season | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | wRC+ | OPS+ | wOBA | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1884 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | .200 | .294 | .267 | .561 | 88.8 | 78.0 | .269 | 0.1 |
| 1885 | 27 | 99 | 92 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0 | 0 | .152 | .212 | .196 | .408 | 51.3 | 31.9 | .200 | -0.1 |
| 1888 | 49 | 196 | 191 | 17 | 49 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 5 | 14 | 6 | 0 | .257 | .276 | .314 | .590 | 87.4 | 87.2 | .272 | 0.5 |
| 1889 | 46 | 175 | 161 | 17 | 40 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 0 | .248 | .309 | .311 | .619 | 77.4 | 72.3 | .301 | 0.3 |
| 1890 | 99 | 419 | 386 | 62 | 127 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 60 | 33 | 16 | 10 | 0 | .329 | .382 | .422 | .804 | 110.0 | 114.2 | .381 | 2.3 |
| 1891 | 53 | 220 | 201 | 29 | 71 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 0 | .353 | .409 | .453 | .862 | 134.3 | 146.0 | .416 | 1.7 |
| 1892 | 66 | 291 | 276 | 41 | 77 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 27 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 0 | .279 | .316 | .377 | .693 | 103.6 | 109.0 | .332 | 0.6 |
Career totals
A total is called out only where it ranks in the all-time top 500; hover a figure for its rank and the size of the field it was ranked in. Ranks are absolute facts and carry no percentile — the population for "career home runs" would be an editorial choice, and the rank is not.