Jose Pagan
San Francisco Giants 1959–1964; Pittsburgh Pirates 1965; San Francisco Giants 1965; Pittsburgh Pirates 1966–1972; Philadelphia Phillies 1973
Percentile snapshot
1963 season — qualified batters
of 102 qualified 1963 batters (min 502 PA)
Career, era-adjusted
wRC+ measured against qualified careers (3,000+ PA), 2,078 of them; OPS+ measured against qualified careers (3,000+ PA), 2,078 of them; sWAR measured against every career in history, 24,011 of them. Only era-adjusted career stats carry a percentile — a raw career total gets a rank instead, because pooling the 1890s with the 2020s is a choice, not a measurement.
Season by season
Batting
| Season | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | wRC+ | OPS+ | wOBA | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1959 | 31 | 48 | 46 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | .174 | .208 | .196 | .404 | 6.7 | 11.6 | .191 | -0.3 |
| 1960 | 18 | 50 | 49 | 8 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | .286 | .300 | .408 | .708 | 97.3 | 98.0 | .317 | 0.2 |
| 1961 | 134 | 474 | 434 | 38 | 110 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 46 | 31 | 45 | 8 | 5 | .253 | .306 | .332 | .638 | 71.1 | 73.3 | .287 | 0.5 |
| 1962 | 164 | 644 | 580 | 73 | 150 | 25 | 6 | 7 | 57 | 47 | 77 | 13 | 9 | .259 | .312 | .359 | .671 | 80.9 | 82.0 | .305 | 1.4 |
| 1963 | 148 | 519 | 483 | 46 | 113 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 39 | 26 | 67 | 10 | 7 | .234 | .277 | .300 | .577 | 63.6 | 68.1 | .264 | 0.3 |
| 1964 | 134 | 415 | 367 | 33 | 82 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 35 | 66 | 5 | 4 | .223 | .289 | .264 | .553 | 50.2 | 56.9 | .251 | -0.4 |
| 1965 | 68 | 133 | 121 | 16 | 26 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 16 | 2 | 0 | .215 | .273 | .256 | .529 | 44.9 | 50.0 | .244 | -0.2 |
| 1966 | 109 | 391 | 368 | 44 | 97 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 54 | 13 | 38 | 0 | 2 | .264 | .292 | .370 | .662 | 79.8 | 83.3 | .294 | 0.6 |
| 1967 | 81 | 230 | 211 | 17 | 61 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 28 | 1 | 1 | .289 | .323 | .351 | .674 | 90.3 | 93.0 | .308 | 0.5 |
| 1968 | 80 | 184 | 163 | 24 | 36 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 32 | 2 | 3 | .221 | .278 | .350 | .627 | 83.5 | 89.0 | .287 | 0.3 |
| 1969 | 108 | 298 | 274 | 29 | 78 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 42 | 17 | 46 | 1 | 0 | .285 | .325 | .453 | .778 | 118.0 | 119.6 | .352 | 1.6 |
| 1970 | 95 | 252 | 230 | 21 | 61 | 14 | 1 | 7 | 29 | 20 | 24 | 1 | 1 | .265 | .321 | .426 | .748 | 102.1 | 102.3 | .338 | 1.0 |
| 1971 | 57 | 177 | 158 | 16 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 16 | 25 | 0 | 0 | .241 | .311 | .342 | .653 | 85.6 | 86.9 | .303 | 0.3 |
| 1972 | 53 | 137 | 127 | 11 | 32 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 17 | 0 | 0 | .252 | .284 | .394 | .677 | 92.0 | 93.9 | .310 | 0.4 |
| 1973 | 46 | 80 | 78 | 4 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | .205 | .213 | .269 | .482 | 16.7 | 31.3 | .214 | -0.6 |
Career totals
A total is called out only where it ranks in the all-time top 500; hover a figure for its rank and the size of the field it was ranked in. Ranks are absolute facts and carry no percentile — the population for "career home runs" would be an editorial choice, and the rank is not.
Best games
Batting
| Date | Game | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970-08-15 | SD @ PIT Gameday | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| 1961-04-30 | SF @ ATL Gameday | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| 1969-06-08 | PIT @ ATL Gameday | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| 1970-08-01 | PIT @ ATL Gameday | 6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| 1972-05-29 | PHI @ PIT Gameday | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
Pitching
| Date | Game | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1965-05-23 | PIT @ ATL Gameday | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1965-07-02 | ATL @ PIT Gameday | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1965-07-03 | ATL @ PIT Gameday | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1965-07-04 | ATL @ PIT Gameday | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1965-07-15 | PIT @ ATL Gameday | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ranked from our own play-by-play game log, which begins in 1901 — not from the record book, so a career played outside it shows nothing here rather than a short list.