Pat Deasley
Boston Red Caps 1881–1882; St. Louis Browns 1883–1884; New York Giants 1885–1887; Washington Nationals 1888
Percentile snapshot
1882 season — qualified batters
of 92 qualified 1882 batters (min 263 PA) · 2 stats not shown: every qualified player held the same value, so a percentile there carries no information
Career, era-adjusted
sWAR measured against every career in history, 24,011 of them. Only era-adjusted career stats carry a percentile — a raw career total gets a rank instead, because pooling the 1890s with the 2020s is a choice, not a measurement.
Season by season
Batting
| Season | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | wRC+ | OPS+ | wOBA | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1881 | 43 | 152 | 147 | 13 | 35 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | .238 | .263 | .299 | .562 | 80.4 | 75.3 | .259 | 0.4 |
| 1882 | 67 | 271 | 264 | 36 | 70 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 7 | 22 | 0 | 0 | .265 | .284 | .295 | .580 | 89.7 | 86.4 | .262 | 0.9 |
| 1883 | 58 | 212 | 206 | 27 | 53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .257 | .278 | .277 | .555 | 85.2 | 78.7 | .257 | 0.7 |
| 1884 | 75 | 264 | 254 | 27 | 52 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .205 | .235 | .256 | .491 | 71.5 | 59.9 | .227 | 0.5 |
| 1885 | 54 | 216 | 207 | 22 | 53 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 9 | 20 | 0 | 0 | .256 | .287 | .290 | .577 | 89.7 | 86.7 | .271 | 0.9 |
| 1886 | 41 | 147 | 143 | 18 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 0 | .266 | .286 | .322 | .607 | 86.2 | 84.1 | .281 | 0.4 |
| 1887 | 30 | 128 | 118 | 12 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 0 | .314 | .367 | .356 | .723 | 102.8 | 101.4 | .339 | 0.6 |
| 1888 | 34 | 129 | 127 | 6 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 0 | .157 | .171 | .165 | .336 | 20.4 | 7.2 | .157 | -0.6 |
Career totals
A total is called out only where it ranks in the all-time top 500; hover a figure for its rank and the size of the field it was ranked in. Ranks are absolute facts and carry no percentile — the population for "career home runs" would be an editorial choice, and the rank is not.