Sam Moffet
Cleveland Blues 1884; Indianapolis Hoosiers 1887–1888
Percentile snapshot
1884 season — qualified pitchers
of 82 qualified 1884 pitchers (min 113 IP)
Career, era-adjusted
sWAR measured against every career in history, 24,011 of them. Only era-adjusted career stats carry a percentile — a raw career total gets a rank instead, because pooling the 1890s with the 2020s is a choice, not a measurement.
Season by season
Batting
| Season | G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | wRC+ | OPS+ | wOBA | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1884 | 67 | 264 | 256 | 26 | 47 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 56 | 0 | 0 | .184 | .208 | .246 | .454 | 57.4 | 42.6 | .208 | -0.5 |
| 1887 | 11 | 42 | 41 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | .122 | .143 | .146 | .289 | 3.3 | -19.6 | .136 | 0.3 |
| 1888 | 10 | 40 | 35 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | .114 | .225 | .114 | .339 | 35.9 | 10.6 | .184 | -0.7 |
Pitching
| Season | G | GS | W | L | SV | CG | SHO | H | ER | BB | SO | HR | IP | ERA | WHIP | K/9 | FIP | FIP- | ERA+ | sWAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1884 | 24 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 236 | 85 | 58 | 84 | 9 | 197.7 | 3.87 | 1.487 | 3.82 | 3.48 | 116.9 | 76.9 | -0.5 |
| 1887 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 47 | 21 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 50.0 | 3.78 | 1.400 | 0.54 | 4.85 | 119.9 | 107.1 | 0.3 |
| 1888 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 62 | 29 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 56.0 | 4.66 | 1.411 | 1.13 | 3.92 | 138.6 | 60.7 | -0.7 |
sWAR is the season TOTAL for a player who both hit and pitched: the record book carries one figure per season, not a split, so the same number appears on both lines rather than being counted twice.
Career totals
Batting
Pitching
A total is called out only where it ranks in the all-time top 500; hover a figure for its rank and the size of the field it was ranked in. Ranks are absolute facts and carry no percentile — the population for "career home runs" would be an editorial choice, and the rank is not.